No description
Find a file
Johannes Millan eff41c041d
feat(project): project completion experience (#8036)
* feat(project): add project completion with celebration + trophy view

Completing a project marks it done and archives it, with a celebration
dialog (confetti + live stats) and a prompt to resolve unfinished tasks
(move to Inbox / mark done). Completed projects show a trophy badge and
a Reopen action on the archived-projects page.

isDone stays distinct from isArchived; selectArchivedProjects is left
intact so completed projects' tasks stay filtered out of Today/Overdue.
Append/merge deferred to #8032. Plan: docs/plans/2026-06-05-project-completion.md

* refactor(project): drop Archive menu item; Complete is the retire path

Archive and Complete produced near-identical end states; collapse to one
user-facing action. Removes the 'Archive project' menu item and handler so
Complete is the single way to retire a project. The archiveProject action,
reducer and ProjectService.archive() stay (needed for op-log replay of
historical archive ops and the legacy unarchive/restore path). Wiki updated;
menu specs cover the Complete flow.

* fix(project): keep completion dialog open for the active project

MatDialog closeOnNavigation (default true) dismissed the celebration the
moment completing the currently-active project navigated to '/'. Navigate
first, then open the dialog.

* test(project): e2e for completion flow (complete, celebrate, reopen)

Covers the resolve-unfinished-tasks prompt, the celebration dialog with
stats, the trophy badge on the archived page, and reopening. Adds an
openProjectContextMenu page-object helper.

* feat(project): confirm project completion

* feat(project): show completion celebration fullscreen

* fix(project): harden completion celebration flow

* style(project): use spacing tokens in completion dialog

* fix(project): align completion screen with project context

* style(project): soften completion screen coloring

* style(project): reuse completion screen surfaces

* fix: refine project completion dialog actions

* fix: complete projects with atomic task resolution

* fix: restore archive path in project completion UI

* refactor(project): remove dead completion code

The project-level completeProject action (OpType.Update) was never
dispatched — completion goes exclusively through the atomic
TaskSharedActions.completeProject (OpType.Batch) meta-reducer. Drop the
dead action, its reducer case, the PROJECT_COMPLETE enum member and the
immutable 'PCO' op-log code (which would otherwise be permanently
reserved for an op that can never be produced); enum count 147->146.

Also remove the unused selectCompletedProjects / selectPlainArchivedProjects
selectors (no consumers) and the misspelled, unused 'angel' confetti
field, keeping the regression tests that guard selectArchivedProjects.

* fix(project): make project completion non-reversible

Completion resolves a project's open tasks (move-to-inbox / mark-done),
which reopen cannot truly restore, so the "Reopen"/"Undo" affordances on
the completion path were misleading. Drop the celebration dialog's Reopen
button and the post-complete undo snack; the fullscreen celebration is
the feedback and deliberate reactivation still lives on the
archived-projects page (Project.reopen kept for it).

Also restore the project title param on the archive confirm dialog (it
was rendering a raw {{title}} placeholder), remove the now-unused
moveTasksToInbox / markTasksDone resolution helpers (the meta-reducer
resolves tasks atomically), and drop the orphaned UNDO / S.COMPLETED
i18n keys. Updates the completion e2e to the close flow and asserts the
resolution props are forwarded to the atomic action.

* fix(tasks): cancel native reminders for project-completed tasks

Completing a project marks its unfinished tasks done inside the
meta-reducer (no per-task updateTask), so unscheduleDoneTask$'s
native-reminder cancellation is bypassed and an OS-scheduled Android
notification could still fire for a now-done task. Add a local-only
effect that cancels native reminders for the force-completed task ids.

Local-only by design: it dispatches no actions (the persistent
dismissReminderOnly/clearDeadlineReminder would each be an extra synced
op), and done tasks are already filtered from reminders$ on all
platforms — only the native Android notification needs explicit removal.

* test(project): drop TaskService spies orphaned by helper removal

getByIdWithSubTaskData$/moveToProject/setDone/setUnDone were only used
by the removed moveTasksToInbox/markTasksDone helpers and their deleted
tests.

* feat(sync): affectedEntities multi-entity conflict detection for atomic completion

WIP checkpoint of the atomic completeProject approach. The Batch op declares
every touched entity (PROJECT, INBOX, TASKs, TODAY_TAG) via a new
affectedEntities field threaded through op-log capture, conflict detection,
the sync server (+Prisma migration) and shared-schema. Per-effect
completeProject handlers (issue two-way-sync, time-block, repeat-cfg)
re-derive the task changes the atomic op bypasses.

* revert(sync): remove affectedEntities multi-entity conflict detection

Reverts 0893a86162. The affectedEntities feature existed solely to make the
atomic completeProject Batch op sync-correct (its only producer). Decoupling
project completion into normal per-task ops (next commit) makes the existing
per-entity conflict detection and effects fire naturally, so this entire
layer — sync-core, super-sync-server, shared-schema, op-log plumbing, the
Prisma migration, and the per-effect completeProject listeners — is no longer
needed. Preserved in history via the checkpoint commit.

* refactor(project): decouple completion from task resolution (Option C)

Completion was an atomic multi-entity Batch op (completeProject) that marked
tasks done / moved them to Inbox inside the project-shared meta-reducer.
Because it bypassed the normal per-task actions, every downstream consumer had
to be taught about it separately — conflict detection (the affectedEntities
feature, reverted in the previous commit), native-reminder cancellation, issue
two-way-sync, time-block and repeat-cfg effects.

Decouple instead: completion is now a plain single-entity PROJECT flag flip
(completeProject = OpType.Update, mirroring archiveProject). Unfinished-task
resolution runs first as the normal per-task actions (moveToOtherProject /
updateTask isDone) from the completion flow, so the existing effects and
per-entity conflict detection fire naturally — no special-casing anywhere.

- project.actions/reducer: restore plain completeProject action + on() handler
- project.service: complete() is a flag dispatch; restore moveTasksToInbox /
  markTasksDone (normal per-task dispatch + Rule #6 flush)
- work-context-menu: resolve unfinished work before the flag flip
- drop the completeProject meta-reducer block, the Batch action, the
  TASK_SHARED_COMPLETE_PROJECT op code, and the reminder-cancel effect
  (unscheduleDoneTask$ already cancels native reminders on the normal path);
  current-task clearing is covered by the existing task-internal effect

Net: ~190 LOC removed here on top of ~1565 (affectedEntities + a Prisma
migration) in the revert. Completion's task resolution is not undone either
way, so the atomic bundle never bought a clean reversal.

* docs(project): record decoupled-completion decision (ADR #5)

Document why project completion uses decoupled per-task resolution + a plain
single-entity flag flip instead of an atomic multi-entity op: the atomic op
forced a cross-stack affectedEntities conflict-detection feature and per-effect
listeners, for an undo guarantee it never delivered. Adds ARCHITECTURE-DECISIONS
#5 and a revision note + corrected undo/bulk-mechanic notes in the plan doc.

* test(project): pin completion ordering + resolution edge cases

Address multi-agent review of the decoupled-completion refactor:
- assert resolution (moveTasksToInbox / markTasksDone) runs BEFORE the
  completeProject flag flip (toHaveBeenCalledBefore) — the core invariant of
  the decoupled design that was previously not pinned
- cover the not-done branch of moveTasksToInbox (no setUnDone) and assert
  markTasksDone dispatches exactly the passed set
- add explicit PCO encode/decode round-trip assertions
- document the inbox-path current-task carry-forward nuance in ADR #5

Composition is covered end-to-end by e2e/tests/project/project-completion.spec.ts.

* refactor(project): tighten completion flow per review

- collapse 3x getCompletionInfo() to <=2: gate the resolve prompt once,
  recompute only after a resolution; each call now wrapped with an error
  snack so a failed archive load no longer aborts silently
- drop the dead post-confirm re-prompt branch (unreachable between two
  sequential single-user modals)
- reuse getDiffInDays + dateStrToUtcDate in completion-stats util instead
  of hand-rolled local-midnight/duration helpers
- use a Set for the top-level-task membership check (was O(n*m))
- drop redundant inline dialog sizing; the panelClass owns fullscreen
- remove dead --project-complete-accent test assertion

* refactor(project): finish review follow-ups for completion flow

- W3: reset the celebration confetti instance on dialog destroy so its
  rAF loop + window resize listener are torn down when the dialog closes
  before the animation ends (ConfettiService now returns the handle and
  fires without awaiting completion)
- S2: extract resolveBgImageToDataUrl() shared by app.component and the
  celebration dialog (was duplicated file://->data-url resolution)
- S3: split completeProject() into _getCompletionInfoOrNotify (dedupes the
  error handling), _promptResolveUnfinishedTasks and _confirmCompletion
- W2: keep prefers-reduced-motion gating app-wide (a11y) + document intent

* fix(project): close confetti teardown race on early dialog close

If the celebration dialog is dismissed while canvas-confetti is still
loading, the instance was assigned after ngOnDestroy ran, so reset() never
fired and the rAF loop + resize listener leaked. Guard with an _isDestroyed
flag and reset the instance immediately if it arrives post-destroy.

Also drop the now-dead CanvasConfetti type alias (superseded by
ConfettiInstance, zero references).

* docs(project): drop non-existent undo-snack from completion wiki

* refactor(project): extract completion task-tree and dialog helpers

* refactor(project): hide Archive menu item; Complete is the retire path

* refactor(project): drop dead archive(), reuse resolve-choice type

Multi-review follow-ups on the completion feature:
- Remove orphaned ProjectService.archive() (+ unused import, spec) — the
  menu collapsed Archive into Complete, leaving no caller. The
  archiveProject action/reducer stay for op-log decode of historical ops.
- Reuse the exported ResolveUnfinishedTasksChoice type instead of
  re-spelling the union three times in work-context-menu.
- Fix misleading moveTasksToInbox comment (setUnDone re-opens, not move).
- Note the as-shipped deviations (no extra selectors, no celebration
  effect) in the design plan so they aren't hunted for later.

---------

Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-08 13:43:38 +02:00
.air
.devcontainer
.github
.husky
.signpath/policies/super-productivity
.vscode
android
build
docs
e2e
electron
eslint-local-rules
fastlane
ios
nginx
packages
scripts
snap/hooks
src
tools
.browserslistrc
.dockerignore
.editorconfig
.env.example
.gitattributes
.gitignore
.gitmodules
.gitpod.yml
.npmrc
.nvmrc
.prettierignore
.prettierrc.json
.stylelintrc.mjs
AGENTS.md
angular.json
ARCHITECTURE-DECISIONS.md feat(project): project completion experience (#8036) 2026-06-08 13:43:38 +02:00
capacitor.config.ts
CLAUDE.md
CONTRIBUTING.md
docker-compose.e2e.fast.yaml
docker-compose.e2e.yaml
docker-compose.supersync.yaml
docker-compose.yaml
docker-entrypoint.sh
Dockerfile
Dockerfile.e2e.dev
Dockerfile.e2e.dev.fast
electron-builder.yaml
eslint.config.js
funding.json
Gemfile
Gemfile.lock
LICENSE
ngsw-config.json
package-lock.json
package.json
README.md
SECURITY.md
tsconfig.base.json
tsconfig.json
webdav.yaml

Banner

An advanced todo list app with timeboxing & time tracking capabilities that supports importing tasks from your calendar, Jira, GitHub and others

🌐 Open Web App or 💻 Download


MIT license   GitHub Discussions

Reddit Community   Super Productivity on Mastodon   Tweet

animated

💻 Downloads & Install

Get it on Flathub Get it from the Snap Store English badge Play Store Badge F-Droid Badge Obtanium Badge App Store Badge

For all current downloads, package links, and platform-specific notes: check the wiki
Get it on GitHub


Ukraine Flag
Humanitarian Aid for Ukraine
Support humanitarian relief via the official National Bank of Ukraine account.


✔️ Features

  • Keep organized and focused! Plan and categorize your tasks using sub-tasks, projects and tags and color code them as needed.
  • Use timeboxing and track your time. Create time sheets and work summaries in a breeze to easily export them to your company's time tracking system.
  • Helps you to establish healthy & productive habits:
    • A break reminder reminds you when it's time to step away.
    • The anti-procrastination feature helps you gain perspective when you really need to.
    • Need some extra focus? A Pomodoro timer is also always at hand.
    • Collect personal metrics to see, which of your work routines need adjustments.
  • Integrate with Jira, Trello, GitHub, GitLab, Gitea, OpenProject, Linear, ClickUp and Azure DevOps. Auto import tasks assigned to you, plan the details locally, automatically create work logs, and get notified immediately, when something changes.
  • Basic CalDAV integration.
  • Back up and synchronize your data across multiple devices with Dropbox and WebDAV support
  • Attach context information to tasks and projects. Create notes, attach files or create project-level bookmarks for links, files, and even commands.
  • Super Productivity respects your privacy and does NOT collect any data and there are no user accounts or registration. You decide where you store your data!
  • It's free and open source and always will be.

And much more!

Work View with global links

Note

The web version has some limitations: See the Web App vs Desktop comparison for more details.

📖 Documentation and Guides

Getting Started

Starting Point in Wiki:
First stepsReferenceHow-To

Productivity Tips:
Keyboard ShortcutsShort Syntax

Need Help?
Visit the discussions page

See the bottom of the README for more information on the documentation.

Advanced Topics

Here are some other topics covered in the official wiki:

Development:
Run dev serverPackage the appBuild for AndroidRun with Docker

Data Management:
User DataIssue ProvidersSync Providers

Customization:
PluginsThemes

APIs:
Sync ServerPluginsREST

Community

The development of Super Productivity is driven by a wonderful community of users and contributors. Thank you all so much for your support!

👀 Check out our awesome curated list of community-created resources about Super Productivity

♥️ Contributing

If you want to get involved, please check out the CONTRIBUTING.md

There are several ways to help.

  1. Spread the word: More users mean more people testing and contributing to the app which in turn means better stability and possibly more and better features. You can vote for Super Productivity on Slant, Product Hunt, Softpedia or on AlternativeTo, you can tweet about it, share it on LinkedIn, reddit or any of your favorite social media platforms. Every little bit helps!

  2. Provide a Pull Request: Here is a list of the most popular community requests and here some info on how to run the development build (wiki). Please make sure that you're following the commit message format and to also include the issue number in your commit message, if you're fixing a particular issue (e.g.: feat: add nice feature #31).

  3. Answer questions: You know the answer to another user's problem? Share your knowledge!

  4. Provide your opinion: Some community suggestions are controversial. Your input might be helpful and if it is just an up- or down-vote.

  5. Provide a more refined UI spec for existing feature requests

  6. Report bugs

  7. Make a feature or improvement request: Something can be done better? Something essential missing? Let us know!

  8. Translations, Icons, etc.: You don't have to be a programmer to help; learn how to contribute translations!

  1. Sponsor the project

  2. Create custom plugins or custom themes

Special Thanks to our Sponsors!!!

Recently support for Super Productivity has been growing! A big thank you to all our sponsors!

(If you are, intend to or have been a sponsor and want to be shown here, please let me know!)

Code Signing

Windows binaries are signed. Free code signing is provided by SignPath.io, certificate by SignPath Foundation.

Documentation: Manual versus Automated

There are two wikis: the official one hosted in by GitHub autonomously generated variant using DeepWiki.com. The manually curated version is a more stable and approachable resource designed to help you understand the app from a more human-focused perspective whereas DeepWiki is optimized for explaining the code itself with little regard for context beyond that.

Official Wiki

It is preferable to maintain local documentation rather than rely on an external service. It also preferable that the documentation is updated in tandem with the code changes as demonstrated in this commit.

Changes to files within ./docs/wiki are linted in CI before being automatically sync'd to the repository's official Wiki hosted by GitHub.

Migrating to Docusaurus is a long-term goal once the content and structure of the wiki has matured and the remaining "legacy docs" have either been reworked or removed. There are some automations in development to help reduce the difference between the published docs and the state of the code while retaining a human-in-the-loop.

DeepWiki.com

If you have very specific questions about how the code works or why a bug might be producing a particular message it might be useful to Ask DeepWiki . It can help "cite your sources" when discussing functionality and code that you don't fully understand as part of feature requests or bug reports.

This automated reference does come with some significant drawbacks:

  1. Intent: Describes what code does, not why decisions or tradeoffs were made.
  2. Staleness: Will *always* lag behind the code.
  3. Code-Focused: Does not provide guides or conceptual explanations.
  4. Cost: Potential future cost and higher resource usage than static docs.