mirror of
https://github.com/johannesjo/super-productivity.git
synced 2026-07-18 08:56:41 +00:00
* fix(sync): conflict-check all entities of multi-entity ops #8334 Multi-entity ops (deleteTasks, moveToArchive, __updateMultipleTaskSimple, round-time-spent, batch board/issue-provider actions) carry entityIds[], but the server operations table only persisted the scalar entity_id (= entityIds[0]). Once such an op was stored, only its first entity took part in future conflict lookups, so a later stale write to a non-first entity found no prior writer and was wrongly accepted instead of rejected as CONFLICT_SUPERSEDED/CONCURRENT. - Add an entity_ids text[] column (populated for multi-entity ops only via getStoredEntityIds; single-entity ops store [] and use the scalar) + a GIN index. Migration is metadata-only with no backfill: pre-migration rows fall back to entity_id, so the fix is forward-only (entities 2..n of already-stored ops were never persisted and stay unrecoverable). - detectConflictForEntity now runs two ordered LIMIT-1 lookups (scalar btree + entity_ids GIN) and takes the higher server_seq, preserving the fast ordered hot path instead of an OR's BitmapOr+sort. - detectConflictForEntities / prefetchLatestEntityOpsForBatch match an entity as the scalar entity_id OR a member of entity_ids (unnest CASE + && / = ANY). - Harden validateOp to bound entityIds (length + per-element), mirroring entityId. Raw SQL validated against Postgres (PGlite) incl. GIN usage and two-query correctness; single path + validation + migrations covered by unit tests. The full conflict-detection.spec needs a generated Prisma client (CI), and the hot-path round-trip tradeoff should be confirmed with a real-PG EXPLAIN. * fix(sync): store entity_ids when a batch op dedups off the scalar #8334 Multi-review follow-up. getStoredEntityIds gated on `length > 1`, so a batch op whose entityIds dedup to a single value that differs from entityId (the server does not enforce entity_id === entityIds[0]) stored [] and that entity became invisible to conflict lookups — reintroducing #8334 for it. Gate on "is the set exactly [entity_id]?" instead, and cover it with unit tests. Also: correct the array-branch comment/doc — a GIN(entity_ids) lookup has no server_seq so it match-all-then-sorts (cheap only because multi-entity ops are rare), it is not an ordered walk; drop a stale "OR filter" test docstring; add a counter-note on getConflictEntityIds vs getStoredEntityIds to prevent swapping. * refactor(sync): single OR lookup for entity conflict detection #8334 Third multi-review follow-up. Revert detectConflictForEntity from the two ordered findFirst lookups back to a single Prisma OR [{entityId}, {entityIds:{has}}]. The two-query split optimized the OR's BitmapOr+sort, but that is bounded by op-log pruning (sub-ms in practice) while the split added a guaranteed extra round-trip on the common single-entity path (doubled by the FIX-1.5 re-check) — a net-negative for the median. The OR is simpler, fully typed/testable, and likely faster in aggregate; a code comment documents the split as the escalation if a real-PG EXPLAIN ever shows the OR is a problem. Review polish (no behaviour change): correct the array-branch/getStoredEntityIds comments (a GIN @> is match-all-then-sort, not an ordered walk; multi-entity-only storage's win is GIN size + keeping single-entity inserts off the GIN, not sort depth); note the batch unnest paths as the first EXPLAIN candidates under load; keep the two batch queries' CASE/prefilter SQL inline (a shared fragment would shift the positional params the conflict-detection.spec mock relies on) with a keep-in-sync note; replace a non-ASCII <= in a client-facing validation error string. * test(sync): update db mocks for OR + prefetch entity_ids lookups #8334 Running the full super-sync-server suite (with a generated Prisma client) surfaced two specs whose inline db mocks hadn't tracked the new conflict-detection SQL: - time-tracking-operations.spec: findFirst now models the single-entity lookup's OR: [{entityId}, {entityIds:{has}}] shape (it previously only matched the scalar entityId, so a concurrent single-entity update was wrongly "accepted"). - sync.service.spec: the prefetch $queryRaw mock parsed userId as the last param and flattened all params into the touched pairs; the #8334 prefilter adds idArray params after userId, so it now finds userId by type and reads the touched pairs from the VALUES join fragment only. Production code unchanged; these are test-mock fidelity fixes. Full suite: 800 passing. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| migrations | ||
| schema.prisma | ||