Emit Miller's existing help catalog (verbs, functions, flags, keywords) as structured JSON so AI agents and tooling can model Miller's surface without scraping prose. The --json token may appear anywhere on a `mlr help ...` command line; plain text help is unchanged. mlr help --json # full catalog mlr help verb cat --json # one or more verbs mlr help function splitax --json # one or more functions mlr help flag --ifs --json # one or more flags mlr help keyword ENV --json # one or more keywords Functions and flags serialize fully (name/class/arity/help/examples; section/name/alt_names/arg/help). Verbs carry a summary, ignores_input, and captured raw usage_text as a Tier-1 fallback, since per-verb options are prose-only today (each verb hand-writes its UsageFunc). Structured verb options are a planned follow-on (see #2098). This is a serialization layer over the existing registries -- no refactor of the text-help path. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| cst | ||
| ast_types.go | ||
| doc.go | ||
| README.md | ||
Parsing a Miller DSL (domain-specific language) expression goes through three representations:
- Source code which is a string of characters.
- Abstract syntax tree (AST)
- Concrete syntax tree (AST)
The job of the PGPG parser is to turn the DSL string into an AST.
The job of the CST builder is to turn the AST into a CST.
The job of the put and filter transformers is to execute the CST statements on each input record.
Source-code representation
For example, the part between the single quotes in
mlr put '$v = $i + $x * 4 + 100.7 * $y' myfile.dat
AST representation
Use put -v to display the AST:
mlr -n put -v '$v = $i + $x * 4 + 100.7 * $y'
RAW AST:
* StatementBlock
* SrecDirectAssignment "=" "="
* DirectFieldName "md_token_field_name" "v"
* Operator "+" "+"
* Operator "+" "+"
* DirectFieldName "md_token_field_name" "i"
* Operator "*" "*"
* DirectFieldName "md_token_field_name" "x"
* IntLiteral "md_token_int_literal" "4"
* Operator "*" "*"
* FloatLiteral "md_token_float_literal" "100.7"
* DirectFieldName "md_token_field_name" "y"
Note the following about the AST:
- Parentheses, commas, semicolons, line endings, whitespace are all stripped away
- Variable names and literal values remain as leaf nodes of the AST
- Operators like
=+-*/**, function names, and so on remain as non-leaf nodes of the AST - Operator precedence is clear from the tree structure
Operator-precedence examples:
$ mlr -n put -v '$x = 1 + 2 * 3'
RAW AST:
* StatementBlock
* SrecDirectAssignment "=" "="
* DirectFieldName "md_token_field_name" "x"
* Operator "+" "+"
* IntLiteral "md_token_int_literal" "1"
* Operator "*" "*"
* IntLiteral "md_token_int_literal" "2"
* IntLiteral "md_token_int_literal" "3"
$ mlr -n put -v '$x = 1 * 2 + 3'
RAW AST:
* StatementBlock
* SrecDirectAssignment "=" "="
* DirectFieldName "md_token_field_name" "x"
* Operator "+" "+"
* Operator "*" "*"
* IntLiteral "md_token_int_literal" "1"
* IntLiteral "md_token_int_literal" "2"
* IntLiteral "md_token_int_literal" "3"
$ mlr -n put -v '$x = 1 * (2 + 3)'
RAW AST:
* StatementBlock
* SrecDirectAssignment "=" "="
* DirectFieldName "md_token_field_name" "x"
* Operator "*" "*"
* IntLiteral "md_token_int_literal" "1"
* Operator "+" "+"
* IntLiteral "md_token_int_literal" "2"
* IntLiteral "md_token_int_literal" "3"
CST representation
There's no -v display for the CST, but it's simply a reshaping of the AST
with pre-processed setup of function pointers to handle each type of statement
on a per-record basis.
The if/else and/or switch statements to decide what to do with each AST node are done at CST-build time, so they don't need to be re-done when the syntax tree is executed once on every data record.
Source directories/files
- The AST logic is in
./ast*.go. I didn't use apkg/dsl/astnaming convention, although that would have been nice, in order to avoid a Go package-dependency cycle. - The CST logic is in
./cst. Please see cst/README.md for more information.