Mirrors/criu
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/checkpoint-restore/criu.git synced 2026-07-17 16:47:50 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix typos

Browse source 
Most of the typos were found by codespell.

Signed-off-by: Radostin Stoyanov <rstoyanov1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@virtuozzo.com>
This commit is contained in:
Radostin Stoyanov 2018-08-22 20:54:30 +01:00 • committed by Andrei Vagin
parent 8f0225a82f
commit 221f115189
44 changed files with 77 additions and 77 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
test/exhaustive/pipe.py
View file

@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ criu_bin='../../criu/criu'
def mix(nr_tasks, nr_pipes):
# Returned is the list of combinations.
# Each combination is the lists of pipe descriptors.
# Each pipe descriptor is a 2-elemtn tuple, that contains values
# for R and W ends of pipes, each being a bit-field denoting in
# Each pipe descriptor is a 2-elemtn tuple, that contains values
# for R and W ends of pipes, each being a bit-field denoting in
# which tasks the respective end should be opened or not.
# First -- make a full set of combinations for a single pipe.
@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ def run(comb, opts):
# Kick the test to check its state
s.sendto(res, '\0CRIUPCSK')
except:
# Restore might have failed or smth else happenned
# Restore might have failed or smth else happened
os.kill(pid, signal.SIGKILL)
s.close()

16
test/exhaustive/unix.py
View file

@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ class sock:
self.sk_type = sock_type
# Sockets that haven't yet been accept()-ed are in the
# state, but user cannot operate on them. Also this
# invisibility contributes to state descriptionm since
# invisibility contributes to state description since
# connection to not accepted socket is not the same
# as connection to accepted one.
self.visible = True
@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ class sock:
def get_send_action(self, to, st):
# However, if peer has a message from us at
# the queue tail, sending a new one doesn't
# really make sence
# really make sense
want_msg = True
if len(to.inqueue) != 0:
lmsg = to.inqueue[-1]
@ -412,8 +412,8 @@ class state:
# Generates textual description of a state. Different states
# may have same descriptions, e.g. if we have two sockets and
# only one of them is in listen state, we don't care which
# one in which. At the same time really different states
# only one of them is in listen state, we don't care which
# one in which. At the same time really different states
# shouldn't map to the same string.
def describe(self):
sks = map(lambda x: x.describe(self), self.sockets)
@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ fail_desc = {
}
def chk_real_state(st):
# Befor enything else -- check that we still have
# Before enything else -- check that we still have
# all the sockets at hands
for sk in st.sockets:
if not sk.visible:
@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ def chk_real_state(st):
print 'FAIL: Connectivity %d -> %d lost' % \
(sk.sk_id, sk.peer)
return CHK_FAIL_CONNECT
# If sockets are not connected the recv above
# would generate exception and the check would
# fail. But just in case we've screwed the queues
@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ def chk_state(st, opts):
# pid!=0 branch, but for simplicity we fork the kid which has the
# same set of sockets we do, then dump it. Then restore and notify
# via dgram socket to check its state. Current task still has all
# the same sockets :) so we close them not to produce bind() name
# the same sockets :) so we close them not to produce bind() name
# conflicts on restore
pid = os.fork()
@ -730,7 +730,7 @@ p.add_argument("--keep", help = "Don't stop on error", action = 'store_true')
opts = p.parse_args()
opts.depth = int(opts.depth)
# XXX: does it make any sence to mix two types in one go?
# XXX: does it make any sense to mix two types in one go?
if opts.stream and opts.dgram:
print 'Choose only one type'
sys.exit(1)